Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Wits Roman Law Moot I- Law of Property, Case

Moot problem: Roman law of property

 

Two years ago, Aulus, a veteran of the tourist industry at Rome, bought a game farm in Campania. At the bottom of the furthermost part of the farm lies a tract of veld which from the outset he has thought is part of his land. He has intermittently traversed it, taken tour groups over it and even hunted on it. He has, however, not fenced it in. Some few hundred metres further is a spring, which Aulus knows is on Balbus’ adjacent farm. In order to water parts of his farm, Aulus agrees with Balbus that he will “forever and ever but at least until his death” be entitled to draw water from the spring for use on his farm. One day Aulus sees a leopard on his land, which rather surprises him since he was under the impression he has only buck. He starts chasing the leopard, and when it is already on Balbus’ land, he manages to wound it in its one hind leg. Yet the leopard is adamant that Aulus will not get the better of him, and continues running deeper into Balbus’ farm. After a hundred metres or so, the leopard collapses underneath a tree without Aulus noticing. Balbus soon realizes the piece of veld at the bottom of Aulus’ farm is in fact part of his land and, angry at what he perceives to be Aulus’ impertinence at using his land, he decides to prevent Aulus from drawing water from his spring.



1. Balbus institutes the rei vindicatio against Aulus in respect of the piece of land at the bottom of Aulus’ farm.
2. Aulus institutes the actio confessoria against Balbus in order to assert his right to draw water.


3. Aulus claims the leopard from Balbus by means of the rei vindicatio.

Wits Roman Law Moot I - Law of Property

FOUNDATIONS OF SOUTH AFRICAN LAW

Practical Exercise – MOOTING

First Section: Roman law of property





OBJECTIVE
This activity aims to develop key skills for legal practice amongst the first year students, whilst opening a space for an intellectually stimulating extra-curricular environment by facilitating the active involvement and serious engagement from the students to the legal studies, starting at the early stages of their careers.



Also, this exercise can be a vehicle for promoting an investigative attitude; a tool for social integration, communication and peer support by revising important notions originated in the Roman Law that will be useful the subjects of Law of Property and Contract in the South African Legal Context.

The introduction to argumentation, speech, and case analysis will be encouraged in a friendly atmosphere will support an individual assessment of strengths and weaknesses in the skills and concepts put to test.


MOOT SCHEDULE

- 27TH of August 2010:

a. Moot Demonstration: Advocates from the Johannesburg bar FNB102, 9AM

b. Moot Manual Handout: FNB 102, 9AM

- 1st of September: Electronic handout of Moot principles, Samples of Heads of Arguments and initial assignment of cases. (Moodle, e.mail to participants, www.bonietaequiars.blogspot.com)

- 10th of September: Physical handout of cases. Moot practice. CM4, 10.15 AM

- 17th of September: Moot Competition. The 20 teams will be divided in two groups of seven and one of six. They shall present their cases simultaneously in adjacent venues. NCB 144, 149 and 150 from 2PM to 5PM.

Prize giving will take place half an hour after the interventions upon deliberation of the 9 judges, time during which the participants and guests are invited for refreshments in the main hall of the building.

MOOT STRUCTURE

- Each team will receive a case and the party they will be representing. They have 4 minutes to present their arguments in the form of actio-replicatio-duplicatio. Thus, a case must be presented and argued completely in 12 minutes. This will allow 84 minutes of presentations, 20 minutes of judges’ deliberations, and 15 minutes of Prize giving.

- Each venue shall have at least three judges from the Law School and/or the legal practice. The configuration of the juries is still to be confirmed.

- Prizes shall be sponsored by a recognized practice of law, to be confirmed.

- Each venue shall have a volunteer time keeper, ideally from the group of tutors of the subject.

- All participants shall be provided with detailed feedback on their performance. This will be delivered electronically to their registered e.mail addresses by the activity coordinator.

- Photographs shall be taken by a Law School senior student who has kindly volunteered to contribute to this event with his participation.

- The law school will be asked to support this activity by authorizing the stationary and catering requisition.

TEAMS
The students participating in the teams presented in the following table were involved voluntarily in this activity; most of them created their own teams, and have shown interest in the subject, as well as in the activity as such.


 Team members
1. Marie Claire Willys
 Marc Roper
3. Mancha D. Mongwai
4. Ahyung Song
5. Sbusiso Phunguwa
6. Noscielo Matumbu
7. Domenick Kumalo
8. Mash Nokwelo
9. Duduzile Tshabalala
10. Kagiso Mahlangu
11. Mandy Dikotla
12. Reason Maredi
13. Shmuel Moch
14. David Wainstein
15. Sinenhlanhla Xulu
16. Catherine Mokgehle
17. Vumbhoni Mathonsi
18. Mpho Matsitse
19. Njabulo Binda
20. Amantle Makwela
21. Naaílah Abader
22. Thandiwe Mchuny
23. Mapaseka Mello
24. Samaria Mahlangu
25. Leila Ismail
26. Carien Erasmus
27. Kholeka Quinga
28. Sylvia Maila
 29. Michael Wellbeloved
30. Robert Freeman
31. Brenda Cassell
32. Jonathan Lievaart
33. Lungelho Mbatha
34. Ayanda Lubisi
35. Nontsikelelo Dube
36. Anzia Jacobs
37. Kgolodelo Makhuthudisa
38. Thabo Ruth Phiri
39. Lauren Smith

Thursday, August 19, 2010

ROMAN LAW OF PROPERTY. Working Questions IV

 Juventa (above), winner of the Miss Rome competition in the year 113AD and wine aficionadoSpecificatio, fructus & usucapio (and some other things) 





1. Javolena is the bonitary owner of a lovely little vineyard (how do you suppose she became that?) and has been tending it for several months. She decides to make some fruit juice, and collects a pail full of grapes and starts crushing them underfoot. Eventually she has an entirely drinkable amount of juice. Does she own the juice? If yes or no, what is the legal basis for your answer?
2. Without knowing anything about him, Calpurnia buys some clay from Titus, who has stolen it. She makes a lovely statue from it, and has a bit of clay left which she leaves in a cold storage unit she set up for that very purpose. She burnishes the statue in a kiln. Does she own the statue? On what legal basis? Does she own the blob of clay? On what legal basis?
3. Juventa likes wine. She receives a bottle of Plonk Estate Falernian as a gift from a friend, and unwittingly mixes it in a little vat at home with a bottle of identical wine belonging to her housemate. What are the legal consequences of this?
4. It’s the year 200BC. Titia picks up a pair of spectacles she saw someone throw into a rubbish bin. Does she become the owner? What conditions have to be met for that to happen, if it is indeed possible?
5. If the year in question 5 is in fact 100AD, how would your answer differ?
6. Think about the function of usucapio in Roman society. Was it a useful legal institution? If yes, why? If no, why not?
7. What problems are there inherent in usucapio?
8. Specificatio and accessio are merely species of the same legal notion. Do you agree? Or disagree? Discuss.
9. It’s the year 100AD and Lavernia is a usufructuary of a tract of land in Pisa. What does this limited real right entitle her to do in respect of the land? Make a list of things she may do, and a list of things she is not permitted to do in respect of it.

10. On the piece of Pisan land, there stands a fig tree. Eleven figs are blown to the ground in a gust of wind, and five fall on the land of which Lavernia is the usufructuary. The other six land on her neighbours land. How might Lavernia become owner of the figs?


Falernian Wine (Poem 27)
by Catullus
Waiter-boy, pour me stronger cups


of old Falernian, since the laws of Postumia


– the mistress – demand it,


she who’s juicier then the juicy grape.


But you, water, the death of wine, shoo off:


far off, wherever, be off to those whose throats are dry.


This wine is liquidated Bacchus.

Who was Catullus?
Wikipedia says:
Gaius Valerius Catullus (ca. 84 BC – ca. 54 BC) was a Latin poet of the Republican period. His surviving works are still read widely, and continue to influence poetry and other forms of art.

It was probably in Rome that Catullus fell deeply in love with the Lesbia of his poems, who is usually identified with Clodia Metelli, a sophisticated woman from the aristocratic house of patrician Claudii Pulchri and sister of the infamous Publius Clodius Pulcher. In his poems, Catullus describes several stages of their relationship: initial euphoria, doubts, separation, and his wrenching feelings of loss. Many questions must remain unanswered – most importantly, it is not clear why the couple split up – but Catullus’ poems about the relationship display striking depth and psychological insight. One such poem with insight to the reasons of his parting with Lesbia is poem 11, which is addressed to his companions Furius and Aurelius and requests them simply to pass a farewell insult to Lesbia.
Further reading: For fun, find English translations of Catullus’ poems online. They are readily available.
What was Falernian wine?
Wikipedia says:

Falernian wine (Latin: Falernum) was produced from Aglianico grapes (and possibly Greco as well) on the slopes of Mount Falernus near the border of Latium and Campania where it became the most renowned wine produced in ancient Rome, considered a “cult wine” for its time, often mentioned in Roman literature but has since disappeared.



Questions for your general education:
1. Who was Bacchus?
2. What is the English adjective we derive from the name Bacchus? How is it used? Use it in a sentence.

3. Who painted the famous picture below? When?